Yeah - your source doesn’t contradict a single thing that I said. And no, my source didn’t assume a high rate with “no basis” - their results are literally pulled from quality assessments and field-based data.
And now you’re talking about a test developed in the first weeks of a pandemic with a novel virus. You conveniently (purposefully?) ignore the massive strides we’ve made in our understanding of and ability to detect COVID since then. The issue was detected rather quickly and those tests were recalled by mid-March, so, no, we weren’t using them for months: https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.businessinsider.com/early-coronavirus-cdc-tests-distinguish-covid-water-2020-3%3Famp
Speaking of convenient, I also noticed how you shifted the conversation to be about testing after all of your BS mortality arguments fell through.
You seem genuinely invested in this topic - I’d recommend some basic Epi and infectious disease courses. These might help your understanding:
https://www.coursera.org/learn/epidemiology
https://www.coursera.org/learn/epidemics